Dev.to1 min read
124x Slower: What PyTorch DataLoader Actually...
TL;DR: PyTorch's DataLoader can be 50-124x slower than direct tensor indexing for in-memory GPU workloads. We reproduced a real PyTorch issue on an RTX 4090 and traced every CUDA API call and Linux kernel event to find the root cause. The GPU wasn't slow - it was starving. DataLoader workers generated 200,000 CPU context switches and 300,000 page allocations in 40 seconds, leaving the GPU waiting an average of 301ms per data transfer that should take microseconds. The Problem A PyTorch user repo
Read original on dev.to0
0Related
Hacker News
$500 GPU outperforms Claude Sonnet on coding benchmarks
Discussed on Hacker News with 377 points and 217 comments.
377
217Hacker News
Whistler: Live eBPF Programming from the Common Lisp REPL
Discussed on Hacker News with 115 points and 13 comments.
115
13Hacker News
Anthropic Subprocessor Changes
Discussed on Hacker News with 98 points and 44 comments.
98
44Get the 10 best reads every Sunday
Curated by AI, voted by readers. Free forever.
Liked this? Start your own feed.
Comment
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading comments…