Dev.to1 min read
AI Coding Tools Produce 281% More Code in Month...
A Carnegie Mellon study tracked 807 GitHub projects that adopted Cursor (an AI-native code editor) and compared them against 1,380 control repos over 20 months. The result is the most detailed picture we have of what AI coding tools actually do to a codebase over time. The headline: developers wrote 281% more lines of code in the first month after adopting Cursor. By month two, the boost dropped to 48%. By month three, it was effectively zero. But code complexity increased 41% and static analysi
Read original on dev.to0
0Related
Hacker News
$500 GPU outperforms Claude Sonnet on coding benchmarks
Discussed on Hacker News with 377 points and 217 comments.
377
217Hacker News
Whistler: Live eBPF Programming from the Common Lisp REPL
Discussed on Hacker News with 115 points and 13 comments.
115
13Hacker News
Anthropic Subprocessor Changes
Discussed on Hacker News with 98 points and 44 comments.
98
44Get the 10 best reads every Sunday
Curated by AI, voted by readers. Free forever.
Liked this? Start your own feed.
Comment
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading comments…