Martin Fowler
Fragments: March 19
David Poll points out the flawed premise of the argument that code review is a bottleneck To be fair, finding defects has always been listed as a goal of code review – Wikipedia will tell you as much. And sure, reviewers do catch bugs. But I think that framing dramatically overstates the bug-catching role and understates everything else code review does. If your review process is primarily a bug-finding mechanism, you’re leaving most of the value on the table. Code review answers: “Should this b
Read original on martinfowler.com0
0Related
Hacker News
$500 GPU outperforms Claude Sonnet on coding benchmarks
Discussed on Hacker News with 377 points and 217 comments.
github.com377
217Hacker News
Whistler: Live eBPF Programming from the Common Lisp REPL
Discussed on Hacker News with 115 points and 13 comments.
atgreen.github.io115
13Hacker News
Anthropic Subprocessor Changes
Discussed on Hacker News with 98 points and 44 comments.
trust.anthropic.com98
44Liked this? Start your own feed.
Your own feed is waiting.
2 comments
This is a really insightful piece. The data backs up what I've been seeing in the industry.
Agreed. Would love to see a follow-up with more recent numbers.
I'm not sure the conclusion holds for smaller teams. Would be interesting to see this broken down by company size.