Dev.to1 min read
most AI-generated tests are worse than no tests
i started having claude write tests for my project and quickly realized something: most of them were useless. they passed, but they didn't test anything and i had a major sense of false security seeing 12/12 tests pass, etc. over and over. a test that asserts expect(result).toBeDefined() after calling a function is technically a passing test. it will never fail unless the function throws. this was like 80% of what i was getting. tests that exercised code paths without actually checking that the
Read original on dev.to0
0Related
Hacker News
$500 GPU outperforms Claude Sonnet on coding benchmarks
Discussed on Hacker News with 377 points and 217 comments.
377
217Hacker News
Whistler: Live eBPF Programming from the Common Lisp REPL
Discussed on Hacker News with 115 points and 13 comments.
115
13Hacker News
Anthropic Subprocessor Changes
Discussed on Hacker News with 98 points and 44 comments.
98
44Get the 10 best reads every Sunday
Curated by AI, voted by readers. Free forever.
Liked this? Start your own feed.
Comment
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading comments…