Dev.to1 min read
What a real AI-assisted PR looks like
Ahnii! A lot of AI coding content ends too early. The model writes a patch. The patch looks plausible. A few tests pass. Someone posts a screenshot and calls it proof. That is not the part I care about. What I want to know is whether an AI-assisted change can survive the whole engineering process: audit, review, CI, static analysis, contract repair, docs drift, and merge. PR #1022 was the first pull request in Waaseyaa where that full chain played out end to end. The Invariant The bug looked sma
Read original on dev.to0
0Related
Hacker News
$500 GPU outperforms Claude Sonnet on coding benchmarks
Discussed on Hacker News with 377 points and 217 comments.
377
217Hacker News
Whistler: Live eBPF Programming from the Common Lisp REPL
Discussed on Hacker News with 115 points and 13 comments.
115
13Hacker News
Anthropic Subprocessor Changes
Discussed on Hacker News with 98 points and 44 comments.
98
44Get the 10 best reads every Sunday
Curated by AI, voted by readers. Free forever.
Liked this? Start your own feed.
Comment
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading comments…