Dev.to1 min read
what if MCP servers had a Lighthouse-style...
i've been auditing MCP servers for a few weeks now. 194 packages scanned, 118 had security findings. that's a 60.8% failure rate. and these are the ones people are plugging into their AI agents right now. the problem isn't that developers are lazy. it's that there's no visibility. when you npm install @some-mcp/filesystem-server, you have zero signal about whether it sanitizes paths, leaks env vars, or shells out with unsanitized input. we have Lighthouse for web performance. we have Snyk for de
Read original on dev.to0
0Related
Hacker News
$500 GPU outperforms Claude Sonnet on coding benchmarks
Discussed on Hacker News with 377 points and 217 comments.
377
217Hacker News
Whistler: Live eBPF Programming from the Common Lisp REPL
Discussed on Hacker News with 115 points and 13 comments.
115
13Hacker News
Anthropic Subprocessor Changes
Discussed on Hacker News with 98 points and 44 comments.
98
44Get the 10 best reads every Sunday
Curated by AI, voted by readers. Free forever.
Liked this? Start your own feed.
Comment
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading comments…